Create Change

http://www.createchange.org/cases/rewards.shtml

Rewards of scholarship

Scholarship is driven not just by intellectual curiosity and funding availability. It is also about the rewards that come to scholars for their work. Promotion and tenure opportunities are an important part of this equation.

Scholarship is driven not just by intellectual curiosity and funding availability. It is also about the rewards that come to scholars for their work. Promotion and tenure opportunities are an important part of this equation.

But in this time of great change, weaknesses of traditional practices for evaluating faculty are becoming more evident. The imperative for institutions to adapt is captured in a 2005 draft report [PDF] of the University of California Academic Council’s Special Committee on Scholarly Communication:

Many faculty may fear that they will be penalized for publishing in new venues. The University will be disadvantaged if innovative forms and media of scholarly dissemination are discouraged for no other reason than that they are new. In the current system we believe that the academic personnel process at times may place excessive reliance on the reputation of the venue to the detriment of specific assessment of the work itself. As the variety of venues for scholarly publication widens, all participants in the review process should rededicate themselves to judicious assessment of all faculty research, in whatever venue, and to extend to innovative forms of publication the same careful evaluation of scholarship upon which the University has traditionally relied to assure the quality of its faculty.

Traditionally scholars in most fields have looked to the impact factor of a journal as a signal, not just of the importance of the journal, but also of the research reported there and ultimately the researcher him/herself. Many believe this is an overly crude system and a barrier to both fairness and needed change in scholarly publishing.

New ways to evaluate research impact of individual works are feasible in the digital environment:

Journal editors and peer reviewers are, in effect, gatekeepers for professional advancement in the “publish or perish” world of academe. Some journals are adopting what they believe are improved quality control processes:

The new digital scholarship lends itself to experimentation that will better position scholarship to thrive in an increasingly complex world.

Discover ways to make change work for you -- go to Change & You.